Rachael
Selfe and Cooper are referring to students in a tech/comm class, so students who are presumably older than my 17 and 18 year old freshmen. That my students are younger and most are ingrained in MySpace culture long before they came to WSU. They have already developed a strong online identity and community, and they mostly live with their peers.


S&C claim that in part due to the use of pseudonyms, and in part due to the fact that "information about gender, age, and social status disappear unless individuals choose to reveal themselves" (852), students in a computer conference can rach a more egalitarian state. What they forget here is that even though others cannot know these things about a person, still, even when behind a computer screen, the individual enacts the roles they've played due to their privileges or lack thereof. But I agree that the fact that anyone can write as much or little as they want without being seen and certainly without being interrupted helps to mitigate the traditional difficulties of power within a classroom. And, the teacher can largely step out of an authoritative role.

Back to the race and gender thing, one huge point of MySpace, conscious or no, is self-exposure. People can display their voice, interests, bodies, and overall identity through a series of rhetorical choices. So, again, w/MySpace, identity politics do not disappear.

"Resisting through discourse means that individuals challenge and attempt to change there predetermined roles to produce alternate roles, or subjectivities, for themselves." (851). "Creating these alternate subjectivities allows students to become active in their own learning process, to become active in their own learning process, to become speakers in a dynamic context rather than being the subjects of a predetermined discourse" (851).

_________________________________________

danah boyd

"Why Youth <3 style="font-style: italic;">MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning, Identity Volume (ed. David Buckingham).

"Interestingly, I have found that race and social class play little role in terms of access beyond the aforementioned disenfranchised population ["those without Internet access, those whose parents succeed in banning them from participation, and online teens who primarily access the Internet through school and other public venues where social network sites are banned"]. Poor urban black teens seem just as likely to join the site as white teens from wealthier backgrounds- although what they do there has much to do with their level of Internet access" (1).

"Many began participating because of the available social voyeurism and the opportunity to craft a personal representation in an increasingly popular online community. Just like their older counterparts, teenagers loved the ability to visualize their social world through the networked collection of profiles." (2)

~~~This is how it happens: visualizing social communities, why not visualize the academic community and make it social???

"The practices that take place through the use of the most relevant three--profiles, friends and comments--differentiate social network sites from other types of computer-mediated communication. Furthermore, what makes these three practices significant for consideration is that they take place in public: Friends are publicly articulated, profiles are publicly viewed, and comments are publicly visible" (7).

"A MySpace profile can be seen as a form of digital body where individuals write themselves into being. Through profiles, teens can express salient aspects of their identity for others to see and interpret. They construct these profiles for their friends and peers to view" (13).

What boyd would next attend to here, were she in the field of rhetoric, would be a question of how students use written and visual language to construct that identity, and how uses of language in identity construction vary from comments to blogs to description sections. In MySpace, the space is theirs to use language as they will, construct audience and resonds to the needs of that audience as they deem appropriate.

___________________________________________________

CCCC. "Students' Right to Their Own Language." CCC Special Issue, Fall, 1974, Vol XXV.

"We affirm the students' right to their own patterns and varieties of language--the dialects of their nurture or whatever dialects in which they ind their own identity and style. Language scholars long ago denied that the myth of a standard American dialect has any validity."

"If we name the essential functions of language as expressing oneself, communicating information and attiudes, and discovering meaning through both logic and metaphor, then we view variety of dialects as an advantage. In self-expression, not only one's dialect but one's idiolect is basic. In communication, one may choose roles which imply certain dialects, but the decision is a social one, for the dialect itself does not limit the information which can be carried, and the attitudes may be most clearly conveyed in the dialect the writer finds most congenial. Dialects are all equally serviceable in logic and metaphor" (11).


_______________________________

James Paul Gee. Situated Language and Learning.

In an analysis of how of the video game "Rise of Nations," reveals its assumptions about th learning process of its users, Gee compiles a list of 25 learning principles that could relate to other learning environments as well. Among them are several that connect to what I have assessed as the benefits of writing work on MySpace:

1. They create motivation for extended engagement.
6. They build in choice from the beginning.
8. "Basic skills" means what you need to learn in order to start taking more control over your own learning and learn by playing.
9. "Experienced" doesn't need to mean "expert," it can mean that one is well prepared for future learning.
13. They offer supervised (i.e. guided) sandbox tutorials (safe versions of the real system).
15. They give information "just in time" and on demand.
16. Learning should be a collaborative dance between the teacher's guidance and the learner's actions and interpretations.
17. They let learners create their own unsupervised sandboxes (i.e. let them be able to customize what you are offering).
22. They allow learners to practice enough so that they routinize their skills and then challenge them with new problems that force them to rethink these taken-for-granted skills and integrate them with new ones.
25. They ensure that leaners have and use an affinity space wherein they can interact with peers and masters, near and far, around a shared interest (even passion), making use of distributed and dispersed knowledge.

These learning principles apply to MySpace as a site for writing instruction just as well as to video games and the general education that Gee mentions.
Rachael
"In Between Lauding and Deriding: A Pedagogical Review of MySpace." James J. Brown and Lacey Donohue. Currents in Electronic Literacy, Spring 2007.

"It behooves educators to understand how such sites operate, the ways in which our students operate on such sites, and how their interactions and relationships with the site can be incorporated into our teaching."

"Some instructors have expressed concerns about privacy invasion and the potential for blurred lines between student and instructor. If you are aware of these issues, ready to face them, and comfortable with the site, MySpace offers a number of possibilities for the writing classroom."

"If our students enjoy writing on social networking sites, and if a significant portion of their lives are spent creating, commenting on, and 'pimping' profiles, it is in our best interest to begin exploring and re-imagining these spaces as sites of instruction."

__________________________________________________

"Computer Conferences and Learning: Authority, Resistance, and Internally Persuasive Discourse." Dec. 1990. College English 52.8: pp 847-869.

"We now notice, for instance, that the traditional forums comprising these classrooms--group discussions, lectures, teacher-student conferences, written assignments--generally support a traditional hegemony in which teachers determine th appropriate an inappropriate discourse. We notice, further, that this political arrangement encourages intellectual accommodation in students, discourages intellectual resistance, and hence may seriously limit students' understanding of, and effective use of, language. As a result, we have begun to recognize the need for non-traditional forums for academic exchange, forums that allow interaction patters disruptive of a teacher-centered hegemony. These forums should encourage students to use language to resist as well as to accommodate and should enable individuals to create internally persuasive discourse, as well as to adopt discourse validated by external authority" (847).

Disruptive behavior is usually related to course material, students' dissatisfactions with it. They don't object to the learning, but the teachers' methodologies.

"We will argue that these computer conferences are powerful, non-traditional learning forums for students not simply because they allow for another oppurtunity for collaboration and dialogue--although this is certainly one of their functions--but also because they encourage students to resist, dissent, and explore the role that controversy and intellectual divergence play in learning and thinking" (849).

"Education, even as it empowers students with new knowledge and the ability to operate successfully within academic discourse communities, also oppress them, dictating a specific set of values and beliefs along with appropriate forms of behavior" (850).

"Thus, we know that using discourse effectively as a social force involves understanding both the values of constancy, or convention, and the value of change, of resistance to convention" (850).

"By encouraging students to resist in academic forums, we recognize and authorize them as members within the educational system, with as much right to initiate change as any of us" (851).


_____________________________________________

How is MySpace different from these online conferences??? It's inherently social, involves online identity, blogs???, power is compromised, I'm a user just as they are...

James Paul Gee... the sandbox: allows them freedom of play, they can choose how much, how little, what, to say. How.

If Burke is right, and language is epistemological, then doesn't it serve students in the process of learning to do so in their own language. Learning is moving from what is known to what is unknown (Barbara)... moving from their own language to the language mandated by convention...

At the same time, in response to notions of teaching change..., in light of our responsibility to give them the tools to succeed in a world so governed by conventions, we must provide the rhetorical toolbox necessary for recognizing, analyzing, and reproducing the rules of a particular discourse community... then they can decide when to push boundaries and when to conform.

danah boyd
Rachael
Villanueva, Victor. Bootstraps.
Monroe, Barbara. Crossing the Digital Divide: Race, Writing, and Technology in the Classroom.
Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives.
Brock, Rochelle. Sista Talk.
Banks, Adam. Race, Rhetoric, and Technology.
Schroeder, Christopher, Helen Fox and Patricia Bizzell. Alt Dis.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
Winant, Howard. The New Politics of Race.
Dixon, Kathleen. Outbursts in Academe.
Graff, Gerald. Clueless in Academe.
Gee, James Paul. Situated Language and Learning.
Panetta, Clayann Gilliam. Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited.
Warren, Thomas. Cross-Cultural Communication.
Plato. Gorgias.
Plato. Phaedrus.
Jarratt, Susan C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured.
Qunitilian. On the Teaching of Speaking and Writing.
Cicero. On Oratory and Orators.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. Racism Without Racists.
MacIntyre, Peggy. Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack of Priviledge.
Pratt, Steven. "On Being a Recognizable Indian among Indians."
Pratt, Mary Louise. "Arts of the Contact Zone."

Rachael



The Library of Congress > THOMAS Home > Bills, Resolutions > Search Results
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display
Bill 2 of 1000
GPO's PDF Display
Congressional Record References
Bill Summary & Status
Printer Friendly Display - 6,987 bytes.[Help]
XML Display[Help]
Deleting Online Predators Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
HR 1120 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1120
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require recipients of universal service support for schools and libraries to protect minors from commercial social networking websites and chat rooms.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 16, 2007
Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. MATHESON, Mrs. BIGGERT, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. GERLACH, and Mr. ROSKAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require recipients of universal service support for schools and libraries to protect minors from commercial social networking websites and chat rooms.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Deleting Online Predators Act of 2007'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that--
(1) sexual predators approach minors on the Internet using chat rooms and social networking websites, and, according to the United States Attorney General, one in five children has been approached sexually on the Internet;
(2) sexual predators can use these chat rooms and websites to locate, learn about, befriend, and eventually prey on children by engaging them in sexually explicit conversations, asking for photographs, and attempting to lure children into a face to face meeting; and
(3) with the explosive growth of trendy chat rooms and social networking websites, it is becoming more and more difficult to monitor and protect minors from those with devious intentions, particularly when children are away from parental supervision.
SEC. 3. CERTIFICATIONS TO INCLUDE PROTECTIONS AGAINST COMMERCIAL SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES AND CHAT ROOMS.
(a) Certification by Schools- Section 254(h)(5)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(5)(B)) is amended by striking clause (i) and inserting the following:
`(i) is enforcing a policy of Internet safety for minors that includes monitoring the online activities of minors and the operation of a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that--
`(I) protects against access through such computers to visual depictions that are--
`(aa) obscene;
`(bb) child pornography; or
`(cc) harmful to minors; and
`(II) protects against access to a commercial social networking website or chat room unless used for an educational purpose with adult supervision; and'.
(b) Certification by Libraries- Section 254(h)(6)(B) of such Act (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(6)(B)) is amended by striking clause (i) and inserting the following:
`(i) is enforcing a policy of Internet safety that includes the operation of a technology protection measure with respect to any of its computers with Internet access that--
`(I) protects against access through such computers to visual depictions that are--
`(aa) obscene;
`(bb) child pornography; or
`(cc) harmful to minors; and
`(II) protects against access by minors without parental authorization to a commercial social networking website or chat room, and informs parents that sexual predators can use these websites and chat rooms to prey on children; and'.
(c) Definitions- Section 254(h)(7) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(J) COMMERCIAL SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES; CHAT ROOMS- Within 120 days after the date of enactment of the Deleting Online Predators Act of 2007, the Commission shall by rule define the terms `social networking website' and `chat room' for purposes of this subsection. In determining the definition of a social networking website, the Commission shall take into consideration the extent to which a website--
`(i) is offered by a commercial entity;
`(ii) permits registered users to create an on-line profile that includes detailed personal information;
`(iii) permits registered users to create an on-line journal and share such a journal with other users;
`(iv) elicits highly-personalized information from users; and
`(v) enables communication among users.'.
(d) Disabling During Adult or Educational Use- Section 254(h)(5)(D) of such Act is amended--
(1) by inserting `OR EDUCATIONAL' after `DURING ADULT' in the heading; and
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: `or during use by an adult or by minors with adult supervision to enable access for educational purposes pursuant to subparagraph (B)(i)(II)'.
SEC. 4. FTC CONSUMER ALERT ON INTERNET DANGERS TO CHILDREN.
(a) Information Regarding Child Predators and the Internet- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act , the Federal Trade Commission shall--
(1) issue a consumer alert regarding the potential dangers to children of Internet child predators , including the potential danger of commercial social networking websites and chat rooms through which personal information about child users of such websites may be accessed by child predators ; and
(2) establish a website to serve as a resource for information for parents, teachers and school administrators, and others regarding the potential dangers posed by the use of the Internet by children, including information about commercial social networking websites and chat rooms through which personal information about child users of such websites may be accessed by child predators .
(b) Commercial Social Networking Websites- For purposes of the requirements under subsection (a), the terms `commercial social networking website' and `chat room' have the meanings given such terms pursuant to section 254(h)(7)(J) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(7)(J)), as amended by this Act .
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display
THOMAS Home Contact Accessibility Legal USA.gov
Rachael
Bizzell, Patricia. "Basic Writing and the Issue of Correctness, or, What to Do with Mixed Forms of Academic Discourse." Journal of Basic Writing. 19:1. Boyd Printing Co.: 2000. 4-12.

First phase in "Basic Writing" studies decided that basic writers didn't write SWE correctly.

-Andrea Lunsford's '80 essay "The Content of Basic Writer's Essays" "treats the reliance of basic writers upon personal experience in their arguments as one sign of their arrest at an early stage of Piagetian or Vygotskean cognative development" (4).

Second phase, which Bizzell's own early work falls intoargued that the students weren't dysfunctional, the system was (more or less), and "aimed to initiate students into traditional academic discourse in a way that remained respectful of their home discourses and cognative abilities" (5).

Bizzell '86 "What Happens When Basic Writers Come to College?" Writer's difficulties are attributed to "clashes between their home worldviews and the academic worldview" (5).

But, the problem still remains in phase two, that they are seen as having issues of "correctness."

Phase Three:
"the
Rachael
Patty's revisiting her earlier claims about the need for teaching academic discourse, as she and her colleagues were inattentive to, if not unaware of, the "conflicts such teaching might generate for students coming from home discourse communities at great remove from the academic" (8).

-Joseph Harris won an award in '89 for exposing the infair pressures that notion of community (academic discourse community) "places on students and the ways it disguises internal disagreements" (8).

While there is still a traditional academic discourse, in many fields today it must "share the field with new forms of discourse that are clearly doing serious intellectual work and are received and evaluated as such, even as they violate many of the conventions of tradtitional academic discourse" (8).

These are hybrid academic discourses.

But we still need to know how to evaluate them and help their users improve them.

Traditional Academic Discourse:

There are certain rules and standards of a discourse community... "the way one employs these language-using conventions (with familiarity, with grace, or tentative bravado, for example) establishes one's place within the community: people of higher status use language (within the shared conventions) differently than do people of lower status" (9).

The community uses and shares this language for common projects and goals. The disourse and its standards and how a person fits in there has a profound impact on the individuals who use it. It's wisespread over land, class, culture, and even time.

But: "Actual humans are usually acquainted with more than one discourse, without being essentially defined by any--which helps give rise to hybrid discursive forms in which the language-using practices of more than one disoourse are blended, sometimes not smoothly" (10).

"Grapholect" is a form of language too complex to be spoken, the most "formal and ultra-correct" form of a language.

ADC’s enforce “a typical worldview, such that the persona speaking” projects objectivity, skepticism, and argumentativeness (10-11). Hence, also male.

Hybrid Academic Discourse:

Growing due to the more recent and growing diversification of academia.

“After all, in how many communities is it considered appropriate to critically question everything one’s interlocutor says, picking apart the other person’s statements and even her or his grammar and word choice, while keeping one’s own emotions and investments in the topic carefully hidden?” (11).

These hybrid languages open up the field for new possibilities. They’re “openly subjective, incorporating an author’s emotions and prejudices, forms that seek to find common ground among opposing positions rather than setting them against one another head to head, forms that deviate from the traditional grapholect by using language that is more informal, that includes words from other languages, that employs cultural references from the wide variety of world cultures rather than only the canonical Western tradition, and so on. These hybrid discourses enable scholarship to take account of new variables, to explore new methods, and to communicate findings in new venues, including broader reading publics than the academic” (12).

Victor’s discourse is “a hybrid form that borrows from both [newyorican speak and TAD] and is greater than the sum of its parts, accomplishing intellectual work that could not be done in either of its parent discourses alone” (13).
Rachael
On the New Capitalism:

"Much work in the new capitalism involves teams and collaboration, based on the idea that in a fast-changing environment, where knowledge goes out of date rapidly and technological innovation is common, a team can behave more smartly than any individual in it by pooling and distributing knowledge" (97).

Affinity Spaces:

intensive and extensive knowledge: (each person entering the space brings some special knowledge); (each person enthering the space shares some knowledge and functions with others.
knowledge is distributed:across people, tools and technologies, not held in any one person or thing
Knowledge is dispersed: that is people in the space, using modern information and communication technologies, can draw on knowledge in sites outside the space itself
Knowledge is tacit: built up by daily practice and stored in the routines and procedures of people who use the space
(98)

New Capitalist workplaces require individuals like those at whom shows like Blues Clues are aimed: people who are empowered and can think for themselves and who think of themsleves as smart and creative people. (middle class, these shows assume that parents are actively involved in their children's development, they prize things like working together and commonality and community.) (102)
Rachael
just a simple place to write/respond/recollect... keep all this in order...